ISO 6943 Rubber, vulcanized — Determination of tension fatigue - Third Edition
Данный раздел/документ содержится в продуктах:
- Техэксперт: Машиностроительный комплекс
- Картотека зарубежных и международных стандартов
- CENELEC CLC/TR 62685 Industrial communication networks - Profiles - Assessment guideline for safety devices using IEC 61784-3 functional safety communication profiles (FSCPs)
- 13
- CENELEC CLC/TR 62685 Industrial communication networks - Profiles - Assessment guideline for safety devices using IEC 61784-3 functional safety communication profiles (FSCPs)
- 13.160
- CENELEC CLC/TR 62685 Industrial communication networks - Profiles - Assessment guideline for safety devices using IEC 61784-3 functional safety communication profiles (FSCPs)
- 35
- CENELEC CLC/TR 62685 Industrial communication networks - Profiles - Assessment guideline for safety devices using IEC 61784-3 functional safety communication profiles (FSCPs)
- 35.100
- CENELEC CLC/TR 62685 Industrial communication networks - Profiles - Assessment guideline for safety devices using IEC 61784-3 functional safety communication profiles (FSCPs)
- 35.100.05
- CENELEC CLC/TR 62685 Industrial communication networks - Profiles - Assessment guideline for safety devices using IEC 61784-3 functional safety communication profiles (FSCPs)
- CEN EN 13611 Safety and control devices for burners and appliances burning gaseous and/or liquid fuels - General requirements - Incorporating corrigendum February 2016
- ISO 815-1 Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic - Determination of compression set - Part 1: At ambient or elevated temperatures - Second Edition
- ISO 24454 Rubber — Acquisition and presentation of comparable multi-point data - First Edition
- Картотека зарубежных и международных стандартов
International Organization for Standardization
Rubber, vulcanized — Determination of tension fatigue - Third Edition
N 6943
Annotation
This International Standard describes a method for the determination of the resistance of vulcanized rubbers to fatigue under repeated tensile deformations, the test piece size and frequency of cycling being such that there is little or no temperature rise. Under these conditions, failure results from the growth of a crack that ultimately severs the test piece.
The method is restricted to repeated deformations in which the test piece is relaxed to zero strain for part of each cycle. Analogous fatigue processes can occur under repeated deformations which do not pass through zero strain and also, in certain rubbers, under static deformation, but this International Standard does not apply to these conditions.
The method is believed to be suitable for rubbers that have reasonably stable stress-strain properties, at least after a period of cycling, and that do not show undue stress softening or set, or highly viscous behaviour. Materials that do not meet these criteria might present considerable difficulties from the points of view of both experiment and interpretation. For example, for a rubber that develops a large amount of set during the fatigue test, the test strain will be ill-defined and the fatigue life is likely to differ markedly under constant maximum load and constant maximum extension conditions; how the results for such a rubber should be interpreted, or compared with those for other rubbers, has not been established by basic work. As a general guide, a rubber for which the set determined in accordance with 9.5 and 10.2 exceeds 10 % is likely to fall into this category. For this reason, the method is not considered suitable for most thermoplastic elastomers.
Similar considerations apply with regard to other changes in elasticity behaviour during testing.



