ASTM D5858 Standard Guide for Calculating In Situ Equivalent Elastic Moduli of Pavement Materials Using Layered Elastic Theory
Данный раздел/документ содержится в продуктах:
- Техэксперт: Машиностроительный комплекс
- Картотека зарубежных и международных стандартов
- ASTM D7228 REV A Standard Test Method for Prediction of Asphalt-Bound Pavement Layer Temperatures
- 93
- ASTM D7228 REV A Standard Test Method for Prediction of Asphalt-Bound Pavement Layer Temperatures
- 93.080
- ASTM D4695 Standard Guide for General Pavement Deflection Measurements
- ASTM D4602 Standard Guide for Nondestructive Testing of Pavements Using Cyclic-Loading Dynamic Deflection Equipment
- Картотека зарубежных и международных стандартов
ASTM International
Standard Guide for Calculating In Situ Equivalent Elastic Moduli of Pavement Materials Using Layered Elastic Theory
N D5858
Annotation
This guide covers the concepts for calculating the in situ equivalent layer elastic moduli can be used for pavement evaluation, rehabilitation and overlay design. The resulting equivalent elastic moduli calculated from the deflection data are method-dependent and represent the stiffnesses of the layers under a specific nondestructive deflection testing (NDT) device at that particular test load and frequency, temperature, and other environmental and site-specific conditions. Adjustments for design load, reference temperature, and other design-related factors are not covered in this guide. The intent of this guide is not to recommend one specific method, but to outline the general approach for estimating the in situ elastic moduli of pavement layers.
This guide is applicable to flexible pavements and in some cases, rigid pavements (that is, interior slab loading), but is restricted to the use of layered elastic theory2 as the analysis method. It should be noted that the various available layered elastic computer modeling techniques use different assumptions and algorithms and that results may vary significantly. Other analysis procedures, such as finite element modeling, may be used, but modifications to the procedure are required.
NOTE 1—If other analysis methods are desired, the report listed in Footnote 3 can provide some guidance.
The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.
This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.3



